Smart City - Blog - Private vs. Public LoRaWAN Networks: What to Choose for Resource Management Projects
04.04.2025
27
Private vs. Public LoRaWAN Networks: What to Choose for Resource Management Projects

The development of the Internet of Things (IoT) in the field of utility and industrial resource management requires a reliable, scalable, and energy-efficient network. One of the most suitable technologies for this is LoRaWAN—a wireless protocol specifically designed for long-range transmission of small data packets with minimal energy consumption.
However, before implementation, there’s a key question to ask: should you use a private or a public LoRaWAN network? The answer depends on the project’s goals, deployment scale, and requirements for security, coverage, and cost.
In this article, we look at the subject of LoRaWAN resource management, including a LoRaWAN network comparison which explores the strengths and weaknesses of both architectures. We provide guidance on selecting a LoRaWAN network for IoT projects related to resource metering—such as water, gas, electricity, or heat, and also consider the relevant deployment strategies involved to help towards making a well-informed decision while minimizing technical and operational risks.
LoRaWAN (Long Range Wide Area Network) is a network architecture based on LoRa technology, allowing devices to transmit data over several kilometers while consuming very little power. This makes LoRaWAN an ideal solution for resource monitoring projects, where sensors are often installed in hard-to-reach places and must operate on battery power for many years.
LoRaWAN networks are widely used in monitoring and resource management systems—from automated meter reading for water and heat to gas leak detection. This data enables utility providers and facility managers to optimize operations, reduce losses, and improve service quality.
Private LoRaWAN networks are deployed and fully managed by the organization itself. This could be a company, municipality, or real estate developer seeking complete autonomy and data protection. These rely on self-owned network infrastructure, including gateways, network servers, and applications.
Private LoRaWAN network benefits include the ability to tailor the architecture to specific project needs. The organization chooses gateway locations, configures encryption levels, prioritizes traffic, and can quickly respond to infrastructure changes. Local management ensures a high level of data security, which is especially important when transmitting sensitive or commercially valuable information.
Public LoRaWAN networks are provided by telecom operators or dedicated service providers who maintain the infrastructure and offer coverage in specific regions. Connecting to such networks doesn’t require capital investment in hardware, making them an attractive option for pilot projects or citywide deployments.
Rapid deployment, wide coverage, and technical support from the provider are just some of the public LoRaWAN network advantages. This is especially helpful for distributed assets where deploying a private network would not be cost-effective. Instead, organizations simply pay for connectivity and data transmission, without having to manage the infrastructure.
When choosing between a private and a public LoRaWAN network, several factors need to be considered. The first is LoRaWAN coverage in the target region. If a provider already offers a stable network, connecting to a public infrastructure may be justified. However, in areas with limited or no coverage, a private network may be the only viable option.
Security considerations and data confidentiality are also crucial. Private networks offer greater control over encryption and access, which is critical when handling commercially sensitive data. On the other hand, if the priority is rapid scalability and minimizing upfront costs, public LoRaWAN networks are the better fit.
Any decision regarding LoRaWAN network selection for IoT projects should be based on its specific needs. If the goal is to build a large-scale urban resource metering system with a high device density—such as water meters in every residential building—and a reliable public LoRaWAN network is available, connecting to it may well be the right decision.
However, if the project involves customized configurations, or coverage of industrial zones or remote sites, a private LoRaWAN network is likely the better solution because it offers flexibility, upgrade potential, and independence from external constraints. In some cases, a hybrid model is also possible—using the public network in central areas and private IoT implementation at the periphery.
Managing resources with LoRaWAN opens up vast opportunities for increased transparency, responsiveness, and cost-efficiency. However, the effectiveness of such a system largely depends on choosing the right type of network—private or public. Each option has its own benefits, and the optimal choice depends on the project’s goals, budget, and scale.
Integrating LoRaWAN into metering infrastructure is an investment in a digital future. The more accurately the path is chosen, the greater the return from implementing IoT in the real economy.
Stay on top of the latest industry news
Thank you, we have received your message. Our manager will contact you shortly.
Our experts are always happy to help and promptly answer your questions. Please fill out the form to discuss your project and develop a tailored action plan.
Thank you, we have received your message. Our manager will contact you shortly.
Thank you, we have accepted your request. In the near future the responsible manager will contact you and clarify the details of the order.
Our experts are always happy to help and promptly answer your questions. Please fill out the form to discuss your project and develop a tailored action plan.
Thank you, we have received your message. Our manager will contact you shortly.